A note before I ask the next question: you guys are wlcome to ask debate questionss yourselves! Please do!
Do you think Sophie and Agatha would have been just as successful if Sophie had attended Good and Agatha had attended Evil? Why or why not?
Well, not quite. Sophie would’ve gotten her prince, not turned into a phsyco witch, and Aggie would’ve grown to like studying Evil. Hester, Anadil and Dot would’ve gotten the roommate of their dreams.
No, because even if they went to the opposite schools Sophie would still be evil deep down inside and Agatha would be good, but Sophie would ruin Tedros’ life and Agatha would never know she was good inside and just turn a bit evil, and it would mess up everything. You can’t change who people are (like the School for New Evil failed, because those who were good were still loyal to good in the end, no matter what Rafal and Sophie did).
I meant they were leaders when the school was for new evil.
No way Agatha is good no matter what. She would of probably failed as an evil student. And Sophie is evil no matter what. She would of failed as well or became a princess by making Tedros fall in love with her. Then she would of probably done what Tedros’s mother did.
Subscribe for exclusive updates about Soman’s newest projects, the SGE movie, and more!